Accrediting interims through QA and QC processes implies a comparing a \u201cstandard product\u201d with common standards<\/p>\n
The issue here is that as an interim community we are all very different horses for courses, and rightly so \u2013 one size does not fit all client requirements…<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Professionalism also implies a drive to improve rather than fit with a standard<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The industry will never be driven<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The icebreaker team are tested on their natural fit with interim management, many will never survive because of the way they are, and that\u2019s OK, and the underlying capability, how they achieved what they did, rather than the outcome<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Case studies imply the past is an indicator of the future \u2013 not sure it is<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 We use case studies for clients to set out what we are like to work with and what we achieved<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 We check 3 lead indicators of success with clients; do they want to do something different? What does that look like? Will they give us the space to do it?<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 If there is one aspect that could be standardised in my view \u2013 infra structure should be in place client tcs and cs, insurance, terms of reference, review process, solvency checks increasingly important<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 An important factor is also not \u00a0setting out what you are not qualified to do, e.g. in a turnaround shadow director issues, illegal trading, companies act 2006 changes and insolvency act 1986<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 When you look at a professional interims experience it is usually is overwhelmingly convincing, what really matters, is what have you and done and more importantly what are you like to work with<\/p>\n
–\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 We focus on the latter, and all of our team go through CPD to improve the effectiveness of the way we work with clients \u2013 cos thats a differentiator<\/p>\n
By the way a very happy NY<\/p>\n
P.S.\u2013 however good we are – I think it is going to be a tough one<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Accrediting interims through QA and QC processes implies a comparing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,15,1],"tags":[20],"class_list":["post-564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-interim-management","category-management-development","category-uncategorized","tag-interim-management"],"yoast_head":"\n